Paradoxes (explained)

Author: Laura McKinney
Date Of Creation: 3 August 2021
Update Date: 11 May 2024
Anonim
The Iceberg of Paradoxes Explained
Video: The Iceberg of Paradoxes Explained

Aparadox it is a logical construction in which an apparently contradictory proposition hides the manifestation of a crude truth.

The function of paradoxes is to reveal something that happens in everyday life from two apparently opposite ideas that at some point are related.

They are usually used as a discursive and grammatical tool, they are very functional at the level of logic and the discussion of ideas because they reach an unexpected conclusion.

In some cases, the paradox can be confused with the antithesis. The difference between the two is that in the antithesis the intention is to draw a plane of differentiation between opposites: in the paradox the opposites also have a relationship of meaning.

  • See also: Contradictions
  1. If you want peace prepare for war. Throughout history, on many occasions the processes that sought peace in a region had to use the war strategy.
  2. What was the first; the egg or the chicken? The fundamental conditions of coming from each other make it impossible to put an initial event in the hen birth sequence.
  3. Not all numbers are expressions of other's squares, but there are no more numbers than other's square numbers. The infinity of the numbers causes subgroups to appear within those numbers, which in turn are infinite.
  4. The triumph of democracy is that many people go to vote, precisely the situation in which each vote is worth less. As the protagonists of democracy increase, the individual interference of each one is reduced.
  5. No matter how short a distance, if you always cover half of what you need to complete it, you will never get there. Another characterization of infinity, this time from the infinite partitions.
  6. Why is water cheaper than diamonds, since humans need water and not diamonds to survive?The classical economic theory explanation of value places the origin of value in subjective utility and not in objective necessity.
  7. What would happen if you travel in time and kill your grandfather? The possibility of time travel to the past would have an impact on the present.
  8. If you could travel back in time, we would already know.The possibility of traveling into the past does not take into account that the past has already been lived.
  9. If the universe were populated by civilizations more advanced than us, why haven't they come? Many times the process of finding the other inhabitants of the universe is thought of as one that can only be done from the earth to the other planets.
  10. Can the statement "I only know how to tell lies" be true?The sets of truth and lies collide with each other, putting the statement in a gray where it is neither.
  11. Augmenting the data for a statistic can lead to misleading relationships. In an apparently contradictory way, it is not convenient to provide all the data on a variable because a relationship that is not such can be found.
  12. If a man's arm is cut off, he is a man without an arm. If his foot is cut off, he is a man without a foot. If your head is cut off, what is it?Questioning the logic with which the head is associated with the condition of humanity.
  13. It's bad luck to be superstitious. Stating in opposition to the belief in superstitions can be done in any way, except by creating a superstition based on it.
  14. How can it be that there are goods that are consumed more when their price rises? The economy faced this paradox and observed that in some cases such as certain luxury goods, a part of what is paid is motivated by their exaggeratedly expensive value. If more comes out, more will be bought.
  15. Although saving is the source of prosperity, it is to the extent that it is not generalized.A generalized saving produces a contraction in the economy, which will bring nothing but problems even for those who saved.
  • Follow with: Oxymoron



Publications

Gerund verbs
Coenzymes
Verbs with R